In recent work with a Scandinavian robotics company, we noticed something worrisome: During leadership team meetings the CEO mostly addressed and consulted with just three of his nine reports, while the rest simply looked on. When we later asked him about this dynamic, he was taken aback—both surprised to hear that he had discernible “favorites” and unaware of the impact his favoritism might have on the other executives. The issue had never been raised in upward feedback exercises.
Stop Playing Favorites
Although most managers believe that they give each of their team members equal attention, respect, and consideration, four decades’ worth of empirical research says otherwise. Studies show that nearly all bosses have—or are seen to have—in-groups and out-groups. Employees on the wrong side of these divides experience a reduction in engagement, satisfaction, commitment, citizenship, innovation, and performance.
Bosses usually argue that any differentiation is unintended and that their reports are reading too much into minor disparities. Both claims might be true. However, it is the view from below that counts. Perceived unfairness is real in its consequences. Managers should first acknowledge these issues and then work hard to head off or repair conflict. Those who don’t may lose key contributors they’d prefer to retain, exacerbate the challenges presented by underperformers, ruin team performance and morale, and hurt their own reputations.
Start by regularly reviewing your treatment of team members. Ask yourself: Did I seek everyone’s company? Did I acknowledge their capabilities? Did I assist their growth? If you are routinely answering no for certain subordinates, they need more attention from you. When a relationship has already gone off the rails, it’s important to rectify the problem: Prepare for a direct conversation, engage empathetically, and then make a plan for how you’ll interact with one another in the future.